Talk:Beauty And The Beast's Rose/@comment-5782071-20190614061823/@comment-24588058-20190626210625

I like the idea you are proposing, Garr. The danger you are suggesting to add would certainly give it more credence to be in the Dark Vault, and I certainly like the alteration of effects to make it much more difficult to stop (after all, finding love is, in a way, simple. But, as best put by the trolls in Frozen, "People don't really change", adding a degree of difficulty to the artifact that makes truly stopping it much more difficult). Though I also agree with Draco; it needs a proximity effect, either something that causes it to activate, draws people in, etc. I also wonder, though more so as a general question as opposed to specifically for this artifact, if artifacts such as this have the ability, in some cases, to affect more than one person at a time (removing artifacts that include wearing, direct multi-person properties (such as Mile Davis' Trumpet), direct proximity effects, etc.), or if they are solely tied into the one person for the entirely of the effects' remaining time. This is more so in terms of how you would handle it; for example, if I may use this Rose with Garr's effects and assuming it activates by touch for simplicity, if the Rose isn't specifically tied to one person, then handling it becomes much more dangerous, since you have to avoid activating it. But if it's tied to one person, that means you could hypothetically handle the Rose with no safety precautions because you will know that, since it can't be neutralized, it can't affect you at all.