Talk:Raven Feather/@comment-1674153-20130330212335/@comment-1674153-20130331035651

My feelings on the matter are that I wouldn't appreciate someone rewriting something I had put work into without explaining themselves to me first. And as it stands I would rather be the one to rewrite it than have that different person do it for me. I give everyone the same courtesy, and I would feel uncomfortable editing it for you, even with express permission.

I'm just picky about downsides - to me they have to be forms of poetic justice or natural progression gone wrong. You turn invisible? Then you're blind for as twice as long as you were transparent. You can increase your density? You become a black hole. Downsides make the usage of the potentially helpful artifacts a 'Would You Rather' game, a judgement of the pluses and the minuses. Sure, skill with an artifact can come into play - the only downside I put for using Robert Frost's Globe is the physical task that it requires - but I'm getting the feeling that lately people are only focusing on the skill aspect. Especially with this whole immunity of downsides idea that has been popping up all over the place. Even Mrs. Frederic can be a victim of Artifact effects, I don't see why we think we can't.