Thread:Prof. Draco/@comment-30644608-20170218002528/@comment-24588058-20170224213125

SarahmHolmes wrote: I like the idea, but maybe not. Because you have many artifacts that were Christie's, then having one used by Miss Marple would be a stretch. What I was thinking was that Agatha Christie was an Agent and worked alongside a woman who she gave the pseudonym of Miss Marple to.

Sounds cool or did I go a bit out of canon for that? We have had some famous authors as agents and consultants in the past. At the same time, perhaps Agatha was partially retelling the stories of a friend. For example, Miss Marple was a real person, while Hercule Poirot (my personal favorite of hers) was made up. I think Agatha was very much a creative mind, and while she might have used some real life cases, I think the vast majority of her work would be her own.

Agatha couldn't be a Warehouse agent, regardless. She lived in Britain, not in America, and Warehouse agents must be from the host country. While the Regents are not held to the same standards (separate note, have we discussed why that might be before?), I don't think she would have been a Regent either. However, we have seen that Lisa da Vinci was an agent (I don't believe Leonardo was), and I like the idea that her mother or grandmother might have had a relation to the Warehouse but chose to keep it secret/retire.

Moving onto Sarah, I don't want to get too in depth, since how much of a stretch we might want to go would be up to Draco to decide. However, I personally would like to think Sarah is more of a unique case rather than one of a million, having an incident occur to her which is something that either people though impossible (keeping with your idea that she comes out of a machine of some sort) or that she is part of a unique twist of natural phenomenon which neither universe (assuming we go with that, directly or not) believes is possible and thus doesn't understand.