Thread:Baboonfan/@comment-3270170-20151016181000/@comment-26382736-20151017060043

I try not to get touchy. The last thing I want is to be an internet drama king, or someone that needs to be handled gingerly. I really don't mind making corrections when they are brought to my attention, but I do prefer that the suggestions from improvement are given with positivity.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a little kid who can't stand to be corrected, but being told off in fragmented sentences seems kind of rude. I don't know how Per took my first reply, (maybe he thought I was being snippy or impertinent), but I saw his reply to my comment as somewhat accusatory.

I think that I'm just being too sensitive to Per Ankh. It seems that most comments from him come out as criticism or being pedantic, i.e. Hammer from Kristallnacht. I think it comes from a good place, but creative control over the artifacts that one makes is important. It may just be a case of an artist talking to another artist about stylistic choices.

I will do my best to keep with the organizational style and upkeep of the original founders of the wiki. I know that I am relatively new to the scene, and I don't want to ruffle any feathers. Whenever I mention that I don't care, or have no opinion about a matter it doesn't mean that I will defy the requests, it just means that I harbor no real stake or opinion into the policy.

Having written out that entire long post, (thanks for sticking it out to get to this part), I do appreciate your comments and feedback. The ability to talk and discuss about the artifacts/history/mythology is one of the reasons I stick around. It's actually really fun! I do think that there are subtle differences between positive criticism, nitpicking, or complaining that are lost in the online format. I will do my best to adhere to any policies that already exist, and to work well with others.