Talk:Bes/@comment-5782071-20180319225940/@comment-5782071-20180321045457

I don't remember saying that (I could very well have, I just don't remember it), but I was mostly complaining (for lack of a better term) about calling this guy an Agent (we can easily fix it so he can be someone who was recruited to be a Regent, though there'd have to be a reason for him to have been recruited, assuming standards for Regent recruitment were still stricter than they would be for a hypothetical normal Agent back then instead of starting out like Agent standards and growing stricter over time to differentiate between Regents and Agents) and his actual name (of course, I didn't know Wiles made him first, and I obviously can't fault you for that - I just think he'd be better off with a different name).