Talk:Joe Markham's Everlasting KONG Toy/@comment-1674153-20160527122945/@comment-24588058-20160528010901

Not quite. Mata Hari's Stockings are neutralized by tearing or harming them.

I have to say that I partially concur/dissent with Scalec. Singular indestructability is hardly a great effect for an artifact. Although what kind of gadget it could be is difficult to say. I mean, as a gadget, what purpose does it serve? Why would the Warehouse bother collecting such an overall useless object unless it had some property that made it completely unique (regardless of whether it is an artifact or gadget)?

I would say that if it is a gadget or a Eureka-type item, it probably has some sort of unintentional side effect. If it is an artifact, then the same applies. Sheer indestructability isn't great (though I admit, it could be a lot worse). Perhaps the toy does something else, like causes the dog to become obsessed with trying to tear apart the toy, focusing all of their time and effort to tearing it apart until they refuse to eat or drink (that'd be more of an artifact effect than a gadget side effect). As a side effect for a gadget, perhaps the material causes an increase in saliva production?