Board Thread:Updates and Annoucements/@comment-24509764-20140406192413

I have noticed something when linking the artifacts section codes to their sections. When glancing over the origins of artifacts, some seemed extremley long, probably because they were copied and pasted from Wikipedia. The copying is not what I'm focused on, its the length. Some artifacts origins are way too long to be comfortably read and understood. For some, it might be better to just narrow the person or event's history down to a couple of paragraphs.

Likewise, other artifacts have very little or no origin at all. Some artifacts lack an explanation of who and where the artifact came  from.

Do you think it would be a good idea to shrink some of the artifacts origins into smaller, digestible bits and expand on the origins of those lacking them? 